Re: [PATCH] memfd_secret: use unsigned int rather than long as syscall flags type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:23:45PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yuri Norov says:
> 
>   If parameter size is the same for native and compat ABIs, we may
>   wire a syscall made by compat client to native handler. This is
>   true for unsigned int, but not true for unsigned long or pointer.
> 
>   That's why I suggest using unsigned int and so avoid creating compat
>   entry point.
> 
> Use unsigned int as the type of the flags parameter in memfd_secret()
> system call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux