On 21/03/2021 22.54, Yury Norov wrote: > Move the macro from tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h > to tools/include/linux/bitmap.h The patch does it the other way around :) > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h | 3 +++ > tools/include/linux/bitmap.h | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h > index 8f2283052333..f530da2506cc 100644 > --- a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h > +++ b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h > @@ -18,4 +18,7 @@ > #define BITS_PER_LONG_LONG 64 > #endif > > +#define small_const_nbits(nbits) \ > + (__builtin_constant_p(nbits) && (nbits) <= BITS_PER_LONG) > + Well, the movement is consistent with the kernel, but shouldn't the definition also be updated to exclude constant-zero-size? It's not that they exist or ever have, in tools/ or kernel proper, but just if some day some oddball CONFIG_ combination ends up creating such a beast, I'd rather not have code like + if (small_const_nbits(size)) { + unsigned long val = *addr & GENMASK(size - 1, 0); blow up at run-time. Other than that (and the above commit log typo), consider the series Acked-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>