Re: [PATCH 06/12] tools: sync small_const_nbits() macro with the kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/03/2021 22.54, Yury Norov wrote:
> Move the macro from tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> to tools/include/linux/bitmap.h

The patch does it the other way around :)

> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h | 3 +++
>  tools/include/linux/bitmap.h            | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> index 8f2283052333..f530da2506cc 100644
> --- a/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> +++ b/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> @@ -18,4 +18,7 @@
>  #define BITS_PER_LONG_LONG 64
>  #endif
>  
> +#define small_const_nbits(nbits) \
> +	(__builtin_constant_p(nbits) && (nbits) <= BITS_PER_LONG)
> +

Well, the movement is consistent with the kernel, but shouldn't the
definition also be updated to exclude constant-zero-size? It's not that
they exist or ever have, in tools/ or kernel proper, but just if some
day some oddball CONFIG_ combination ends up creating such a beast, I'd
rather not have code like

+	if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+		unsigned long val = *addr & GENMASK(size - 1, 0);

blow up at run-time.

Other than that (and the above commit log typo), consider the series

Acked-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux