Re: [RFC v8 13/20] um: lkl: integrate with irq infrastructure of UML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 10:20 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> 
> > > -	if (sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &sig_mask, NULL) < 0)
> > > -		panic("sigprocmask failed - errno = %d\n", errno);
> > > +	if (pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &sig_mask, NULL) < 0)
> > > +		panic("pthread_sigmask failed - errno = %d\n", errno);
> > 
> > UML doesn't normally link with libpthread, and LKL doesn't actually
> > appear to require it either (since it has its lkl_thread and all), so
> > this seems wrong?
> 
> I think both UML/LKL link with libpthread.  See old
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh, or [01/20] patch.
> 
> -		${CC} ${CFLAGS_vmlinux}				\
> -			${strip_debug}				\
> -			-o ${output}				\
> -			-Wl,-T,${lds}				\
> -			${objects}				\
> -			-lutil -lrt -lpthread
> -		rm -f linux

Interesting. You're right, I really didn't expect that, nor did I ever
see that before.

How does this interact with all the clone() calls etc. that UML does?

johannes




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux