On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 16/03/2021 02.54, Yury Norov wrote: > > GENMASK(h, l) may be passed with unsigned types. In such case, type-limits > > warning is generated for example in case of GENMASK(h, 0). ... > I don't like that kind of collateral damage. I seem to recall another > instance where a macro was instead rewritten to avoid triggering the > type-limits warning (with a comment explaining the uglyness). Something like > > foo > bar is the same as > !(foo <= bar) which is the same as > !(foo == bar || foo < bar) > > Dunno if that would work here, but if it did, it would have the bonus > that when somebody builds the kernel proper with Wtype-limits enabled > (maybe W=1 or W=2) there would be no false positives from GENMASK to > wade through. > > Alternatively, we really should consider making use of _Pragma to > locally disable/re-enable certain warnings. Rasmus, in the kernel the same was fixed as per 355a3587d4ca. I don't know why tools should be different to that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
