On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:31:11 PST (-0800), atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:19 PST (-0800), atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
>> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
>> it again.
>>
>> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
>> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
>>
>> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
>> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
>> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
>> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
>> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
>> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
>>
>> # numactl --hardware
>> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
>> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
>> node 0 size: 486 MB
>> node 0 free: 470 MB
>> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
>> node 1 size: 424 MB
>> node 1 free: 408 MB
>> node distances:
>> node 0 1
>> 0: 10 20
>> 1: 20 10
>> # numactl -show
>> policy: default
>> preferred node: current
>> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>> cpubind: 0 1
>> nodebind: 0 1
>> membind: 0 1
>>
>> The patches are also available at
>> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.11_numa_unified_v5
>>
>> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
>>
>> Testing:
>> RISC-V:
>> Tested in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
>>
>> ARM64:
>> 2 socket kunpeng920 (4 nodes around 250G a node)
>> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Changes from v4->v5:
>> 1. Added by Acked-by & Reviewed-by tags.
>> 2. Swapped patch 1 & 2 in v4 version.
>>
>> Changes from v3->v4:
>> 1. Removed redundant duplicate header.
>> 2. Added Reviewed-by tags.
>>
>> Changes from v2->v3:
>> 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
>> 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
>> 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
>>
>> Changes from v1->v2:
>> 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
>> 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
>> 3. Fixed few typos.
>>
>> Atish Patra (4):
>> arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
>> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
>> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
>> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
>>
>> Greentime Hu (1):
>> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
>> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
>>
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 48 +----------------
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 12 -----
>> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 -
>> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +-
>> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 31 ++++++++++-
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 +++++
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h | 8 +++
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h | 14 +++++
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 21 ++++++++
>> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 11 +++-
>> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 ++++-
>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 10 +++-
>> drivers/base/Kconfig | 6 +++
>> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 27 ++++++++--
>> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
>> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (96%)
>> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
> Hey Palmer,
> I did not see this series in for-next. Let me know if you need
> anything else to be done for this series.
Sorry about that. It's on for-next, with Randy's comment addressed. There was
one merge conflict: we don't have resource_init() in for-next yet (which I
think means I missed something else).
resource_init is changed to init_resource and moved to setup.c in the
following patch which was merged in 5.11 MW.
00ab027a3b82 RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree
Ah, great, for some reason I thought we hadn't merged those yet.
IDK if that's necessary for the NUMA
stuff, I just dropped it. I haven't tested this yet.
