On 2021-01-09 06:31, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
Via:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1610099389-28329-1-git-send-email-pnagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
diff --git a/include/linux/init.h b/include/linux/init.h
index 7b53cb3..617adcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/init.h
+++ b/include/linux/init.h
@@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ void __init parse_early_options(char *cmdline);
/* Data marked not to be saved by software suspend */
#define __nosavedata __section(".data..nosave")
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_RTIC
+#define __rticdata __section(".bss.rtic")
if you put:
#else
#define __rticdata
here, then you wouldn't need to label each datum you put in there.
+#endif
+
#ifdef MODULE
#define __exit_p(x) x
#else
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -104,7 +104,11 @@
#include "audit.h"
#include "avc_ss.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_RTIC
+struct selinux_state selinux_state __rticdata;
+#else
struct selinux_state selinux_state;
+#endif
so you could then drop the if-def here.
Will update this in next version, thank you for the suggestion.
Happy to see this resolved when building with LLD+LTO, which has been a
problem in the past.
Yes, downstream we have this verified with LTO configs enabled. Let us
know if
you are suggesting to check anything additionally here.
Disabling selinux is a common attack vector on Android devices, so
happy
to see some effort towards mitigation. You might want to communicate
the feature more to existing OEMs that are using your chipsets that
support this feature.
Glad to know the idea looks good! Yes, we will work on that, will
communicate
internally as well, thank you.
