Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:47:22AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:00:14PM -0800, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 155 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..036fa28
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> > +This document contains brief definitions of LKMM-related terms.  Like most
> > +glossaries, it is not intended to be read front to back (except perhaps
> > +as a way of confirming a diagnosis of OCD), but rather to be searched
> > +for specific terms.
> > +
> > +
> > +Address Dependency:  When the address of a later memory access is computed
> > +	based on the value returned by an earlier load, an "address
> > +	dependency" extends from that load extending to the later access.
> > +	Address dependencies are quite common in RCU read-side critical
> > +	sections:
> > +
> > +	 1 rcu_read_lock();
> > +	 2 p = rcu_dereference(gp);
> > +	 3 do_something(p->a);
> > +	 4 rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > +	 In this case, because the address of "p->a" on line 3 is computed
> > +	 from the value returned by the rcu_dereference() on line 2, the
> > +	 address dependency extends from that rcu_dereference() to that
> > +	 "p->a".  In rare cases, optimizing compilers can destroy address
> > +	 dependencies.	Please see Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt
> > +	 for more information.
> > +
> > +	 See also "Control Dependency".
> > +
> > +Acquire:  With respect to a lock, acquiring that lock, for example,
> > +	using spin_lock().  With respect to a non-lock shared variable,
> > +	a special operation that includes a load and which orders that
> > +	load before later memory references running on that same CPU.
> > +	An example special acquire operation is smp_load_acquire(),
> > +	but atomic_read_acquire() and atomic_xchg_acquire() also include
> > +	acquire loads.
> > +
> > +	When an acquire load returns the value stored by a release store
> > +	to that same variable, then all operations preceding that store
> 
> Change this to:
> 
> 	When an acquire load reads-from a release store
> 
> , and put a reference to "Reads-from"? I think this makes the document
> more consistent in that it makes clear "an acquire load returns the
> value stored by a release store to the same variable" is not a special
> case, it's simple a "Reads-from".
> 
> > +	happen before any operations following that load acquire.
> 
> Add a reference to the definition of "happen before" in explanation.txt?

How about as shown below?  I currently am carrying this as a separate
commit, but I might merge it into this one later on.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 774a52cd3d80d6b657ae6c14c10bd9fc437068f3
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Nov 6 09:58:01 2020 -0800

    tools/memory-model: Tie acquire loads to reads-from
    
    This commit explicitly makes the connection between acquire loads and
    the reads-from relation.  It also adds an entry for happens-before,
    and refers to the corresponding section of explanation.txt.
    
    Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
index 3924aca..383151b 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ Acquire:  With respect to a lock, acquiring that lock, for example,
 	acquire loads.
 
 	When an acquire load returns the value stored by a release store
-	to that same variable, then all operations preceding that store
-	happen before any operations following that load acquire.
+	to that same variable, (in other words, the acquire load "reads
+	from" the release store), then all operations preceding that
+	store "happen before" any operations following that load acquire.
 
-	See also "Relaxed" and "Release".
+	See also "Happens-Before", "Reads-From", "Relaxed", and "Release".
 
 Coherence (co):  When one CPU's store to a given variable overwrites
 	either the value from another CPU's store or some later value,
@@ -102,6 +103,11 @@ Fully Ordered:  An operation such as smp_mb() that orders all of
 	that orders all of its CPU's prior accesses, itself, and
 	all of its CPU's subsequent accesses.
 
+Happens-Before (hb): A relation between two accesses in which LKMM
+	guarantees the first access precedes the second.  For more
+	detail, please see the "THE HAPPENS-BEFORE RELATION: hb"
+	section of explanation.txt.
+
 Marked Access:  An access to a variable that uses an special function or
 	macro such as "r1 = READ_ONCE()" or "smp_store_release(&a, 1)".
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux