Re: [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paul,

On 2020/11/06 7:00, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This commit adds type information for global variables in the litmus
> tests in order to allow easier use with klitmus7.

IIUC, klitmus7 is happy with existing litmus tests under tools/memory-model.
So I don't think this change is necessary.

As a matter of fact, I was preparing a patch set to empty most of the
initialization blocks in perfbook's CodeSamples/formal/ litmus tests.

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus        | 4 +++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus        | 4 +++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus        | 4 +++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus             | 4 +++-
>  .../litmus-tests/IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus             | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus   | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus        | 7 ++++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus            | 6 +++++-
>  .../ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus       | 6 +++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus            | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus             | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus              | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus       | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus     | 5 +++--
>  .../litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus            | 2 ++
>  .../memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus | 2 ++
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus                  | 6 +++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus              | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus             | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus               | 6 +++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+fencembonceonces.litmus          | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus               | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus           | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus               | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus         | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus              | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces.litmus  | 5 ++++-
>  tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus        | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once.litmus    | 5 ++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus        | 7 ++++++-
>  .../litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus        | 7 ++++++-
>  .../Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus     | 6 +++++-
>  32 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> index 967f9f2..772544f 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ C CoRR+poonceonce+Once
>   * reads from the same variable are ordered.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> index 4635739..5faae98 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ C CoRW+poonceonce+Once
>   * a given variable and a later write to that same variable are ordered.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> index bb068c9..77c9cc9 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ C CoWR+poonceonce+Once
>   * given variable and a later read from that same variable are ordered.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus
> index 0d9f0a9..85ef746 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ C CoWW+poonceonce
>   * writes to the same variable are ordered.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> index e729d27..87aa900 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> @@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ C IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce
>   * process?  This litmus test exercises LKMM's "propagation" rule.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> index 4b54dd6..f84022d 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
> @@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ C IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce
>   * different process?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> index 094d58d..398f624 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ C ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce
>   * (in P0() and P1()) is visible to external process P2().
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	spinlock_t mylock;
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
> index b321aa6..212a432 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@ C ISA2+poonceonces
>   * of the smp_load_acquire() invocations are replaced by READ_ONCE()?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> index 025b046..7afd856 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> @@ -11,7 +11,11 @@ C ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce
>   * (AKA non-rf) link, so release-acquire is all that is needed.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus
> index 4727f5a..c8a93c7 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus
> @@ -11,7 +11,10 @@ C LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce
>   * another control dependency and order would still be maintained.)
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus
> index 07b9904..2fa0295 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease
>   * to the other?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus
> index 74c49cb..2107306 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ C LB+poonceonces
>   * be prevented even with no explicit ordering?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
> index a273da9..e04b71b 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce
>   * is usually better to use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
> index 97731b4..18df682 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
> @@ -10,8 +10,9 @@ C MP+onceassign+derefonce
>   *)
>  
>  {
> -y=z;
> -z=0;
> +	int x;
> +	int *y=z;
> +	int z=0;
>  }
>  
>  P0(int *x, int **y)
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> index 50f4d62..b1b1266 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ C MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil
>   *)
>  
>  {
> +	spinlock_t lo;
> +	int x;
>  }
>  
>  P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> index abf81e7..867c75d 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ C MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil
>   *)
>  
>  {
> +	spinlock_t lo;
> +	int x;
>  }
>  
>  P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
> index 712a4fcd..63e0f67 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
> @@ -11,7 +11,11 @@ C MP+polocks
>   * to see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	spinlock_t mylock;
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> index 172f014..68180a4 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ C MP+poonceonces
>   * no ordering at all?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> index d52c684..19f3e68 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce
>   * pattern.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
> index 72c9276..4ac189a 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
> @@ -11,7 +11,11 @@ C MP+porevlocks
>   * see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	spinlock_t mylock;
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+fencembonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+fencembonceonces.litmus
> index 222a0b8..af9463b 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+fencembonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+fencembonceonces.litmus
> @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@ C R+fencembonceonces
>   * cause the resulting test to be allowed.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus
> index 5386f12..bcd5574e 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C R+poonceonces
>   * store propagation delays.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus
> index 1847982..c36341d 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus
> @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ C S+fencewmbonceonce+poacquireonce
>   * store against a subsequent store?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus
> index 8c9c2f8..7775c23 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@ C S+poonceonces
>   * READ_ONCE(), is ordering preserved?
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus
> index ed5fff1..833cdfe 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus
> @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@ C SB+fencembonceonces
>   * suffice, but not much else.)
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus
> index 10d5507..c92211e 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C SB+poonceonces
>   * variable that the preceding process reads.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces.litmus
> index 04a1660..84344b4 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces.litmus
> @@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ C SB+rfionceonce-poonceonces
>   * This litmus test demonstrates that LKMM is not fully multicopy atomic.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus
> index 6a2bc12..4314947 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ C WRC+poonceonces+Once
>   * test has no ordering at all.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once.litmus
> index e994725..554999c 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once.litmus
> @@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ C WRC+pooncerelease+fencermbonceonce+Once
>   * is A-cumulative in LKMM.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus
> index 415248f..265a95f 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus
> @@ -9,7 +9,12 @@ C Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce
>   * by CPUs not holding that lock.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	spinlock_t mylock;
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> index 10a2aa0..0c9aea8 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> @@ -8,7 +8,12 @@ C Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce
>   * seen as ordered by a third process not holding that lock.
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	spinlock_t mylock;
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus
> index 88e70b8..661f9aa 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus
> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ C Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce
>   * involving locking.)
>   *)
>  
> -{}
> +{
> +	int x;
> +	int y;
> +	int z;
> +}
>  
>  P0(int *x, int *y)
>  {
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux