On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, >> are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? >> >> I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to >> 5.11 then. > > I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it > on a temporary branch over here > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs > > under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not > what you were looking for. Well, we'll want it in linux-next and then 5.10. Either a merge through the RISC-V maintainer, or as part of the base branch from Al would make sense to me. > > Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my > mail history, so sorry if I just missed it. > > Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this > stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some > dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space > overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let > me know if I'm doing something wrong.
