Re: [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Andrew Morton's message of August 22, 2020 6:14 am:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 01:12:09 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This changes the awkward approach where architectures provide init
>> functions to determine which levels they can provide large mappings for,
>> to one where the arch is queried for each call.
>> 
>> This removes code and indirection, and allows constant-folding of dead
>> code for unsupported levels.
>> 
>> This also adds a prot argument to the arch query. This is unused
>> currently but could help with some architectures (e.g., some powerpc
>> processors can't map uncacheable memory with large pages).
>> 
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
>> @@ -1,4 +1,12 @@
>>  #ifndef _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>>  #define _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>>  
>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
>> +bool arch_vmap_p4d_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +bool arch_vmap_pud_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +bool arch_vmap_pmd_supported(pgprot_t prot);
>> +#endif
> 
> Moving these out of generic code and into multiple arch headers is
> unfortunate.  Can we leave them in include/linux/somewhere?  And remove
> the ifdefs, if so inclined - they just move the build error from
> link-time to compile-time, and such an error shouldn't occur!

Yeah this was just an intermediate step as you saw. It's a bit 
unfortunate, but I thought it made the arch changes clearer.

Thanks,
Nick





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux