On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 13:31, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to come to this rather late -- this comment equally applies to v2 > > so I'm replying here to have context. > > ... and now I see that was already applied, so please ignore this! Thank you for the comment anyway. If this is something urgent, we could send a separate patch to change. My argument in favour of keeping it as-is was that the alternative would throw away the "type" and we no longer recognize a difference between arguments (in fairness, currently not important though). If, say, we get an RMW that has a constant argument though, the current version would do the "right thing" as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm overly conservative here, but it saves us worrying about some future use-case breaking this more than before. Thanks, -- Marco
