Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] unify generic instances of csum_partial_copy_nocheck()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 08:11:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:30:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > Sorry, I meant csum_and_copy_from_nocheck, just as in this patch.
> > > 
> > > Merging your branch into the net-next tree thus will conflict in
> > > the nios2 and asm-geneeric/checksum.h as well as lib/checksum.c.
> > 
> > Noted, but that asm-generic/checksum.h conflict will be "massage
> > in net-next/outright removal in this branch"; the same goes for
> > lib/checksum.c and nios2.  It's c6x that is unpleasant in that respect...
> 
> What about just rebasing your branch on the net-next tree?

For now I've just cherry-picked your commit in there.  net-next interaction
there is minimal; most of the PITA (and potential breakage) is in arch/*...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux