[PATCH v2 5/8] kcsan: Test support for compound instrumentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Changes kcsan-test module to support checking reports that include
compound instrumentation. Since we should not fail the test if this
support is unavailable, we have to add a config variable that the test
can use to decide what to check for.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
* Fix CC_HAS_TSAN_COMPOUND_READ_BEFORE_WRITE: s/--param -tsan/--param tsan/
---
 kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 lib/Kconfig.kcsan         |  5 +++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c
index 721180cbbab1..ebe7fd245104 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <trace/events/printk.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_TSAN_COMPOUND_READ_BEFORE_WRITE
+#define __KCSAN_ACCESS_RW(alt) (KCSAN_ACCESS_COMPOUND | KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE)
+#else
+#define __KCSAN_ACCESS_RW(alt) (alt)
+#endif
+
 /* Points to current test-case memory access "kernels". */
 static void (*access_kernels[2])(void);
 
@@ -186,20 +192,21 @@ static bool report_matches(const struct expect_report *r)
 
 	/* Access 1 & 2 */
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+		const int ty = r->access[i].type;
 		const char *const access_type =
-			(r->access[i].type & KCSAN_ACCESS_ASSERT) ?
-				((r->access[i].type & KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE) ?
-					 "assert no accesses" :
-					 "assert no writes") :
-				((r->access[i].type & KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE) ?
-					 "write" :
-					 "read");
+			(ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_ASSERT) ?
+				      ((ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE) ?
+					       "assert no accesses" :
+					       "assert no writes") :
+				      ((ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE) ?
+					       ((ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_COMPOUND) ?
+							"read-write" :
+							"write") :
+					       "read");
 		const char *const access_type_aux =
-			(r->access[i].type & KCSAN_ACCESS_ATOMIC) ?
-				" (marked)" :
-				((r->access[i].type & KCSAN_ACCESS_SCOPED) ?
-					 " (scoped)" :
-					 "");
+			(ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_ATOMIC) ?
+				      " (marked)" :
+				      ((ty & KCSAN_ACCESS_SCOPED) ? " (scoped)" : "");
 
 		if (i == 1) {
 			/* Access 2 */
@@ -277,6 +284,12 @@ static noinline void test_kernel_write_atomic(void)
 	WRITE_ONCE(test_var, READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(test_sink) + 1);
 }
 
+static noinline void test_kernel_atomic_rmw(void)
+{
+	/* Use builtin, so we can set up the "bad" atomic/non-atomic scenario. */
+	__atomic_fetch_add(&test_var, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+}
+
 __no_kcsan
 static noinline void test_kernel_write_uninstrumented(void) { test_var++; }
 
@@ -439,8 +452,8 @@ static void test_concurrent_races(struct kunit *test)
 	const struct expect_report expect = {
 		.access = {
 			/* NULL will match any address. */
-			{ test_kernel_rmw_array, NULL, 0, KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
-			{ test_kernel_rmw_array, NULL, 0, 0 },
+			{ test_kernel_rmw_array, NULL, 0, __KCSAN_ACCESS_RW(KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE) },
+			{ test_kernel_rmw_array, NULL, 0, __KCSAN_ACCESS_RW(0) },
 		},
 	};
 	static const struct expect_report never = {
@@ -629,6 +642,29 @@ static void test_read_plain_atomic_write(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, match_expect);
 }
 
+/* Test that atomic RMWs generate correct report. */
+__no_kcsan
+static void test_read_plain_atomic_rmw(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct expect_report expect = {
+		.access = {
+			{ test_kernel_read, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), 0 },
+			{ test_kernel_atomic_rmw, &test_var, sizeof(test_var),
+				KCSAN_ACCESS_COMPOUND | KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE | KCSAN_ACCESS_ATOMIC },
+		},
+	};
+	bool match_expect = false;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_IGNORE_ATOMICS))
+		return;
+
+	begin_test_checks(test_kernel_read, test_kernel_atomic_rmw);
+	do {
+		match_expect = report_matches(&expect);
+	} while (!end_test_checks(match_expect));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, match_expect);
+}
+
 /* Zero-sized accesses should never cause data race reports. */
 __no_kcsan
 static void test_zero_size_access(struct kunit *test)
@@ -942,6 +978,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kcsan_test_cases[] = {
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_write_write_struct_part),
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_read_atomic_write_atomic),
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_read_plain_atomic_write),
+	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_read_plain_atomic_rmw),
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_zero_size_access),
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_data_race),
 	KCSAN_KUNIT_CASE(test_assert_exclusive_writer),
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
index 3d282d51849b..f271ff5fbb5a 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ menuconfig KCSAN
 
 if KCSAN
 
+# Compiler capabilities that should not fail the test if they are unavailable.
+config CC_HAS_TSAN_COMPOUND_READ_BEFORE_WRITE
+	def_bool (CC_IS_CLANG && $(cc-option,-fsanitize=thread -mllvm -tsan-compound-read-before-write=1)) || \
+		 (CC_IS_GCC && $(cc-option,-fsanitize=thread --param tsan-compound-read-before-write=1))
+
 config KCSAN_VERBOSE
 	bool "Show verbose reports with more information about system state"
 	depends on PROVE_LOCKING
-- 
2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux