On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:05:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Kees, > > Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:34:48AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx> > >> > >> Align the end of the .bss..page_aligned and .data..page_aligned section > >> on page-size too. Otherwise the linker might place other objects on the > >> page of the last ..page_aligned object. This is inconsistent with other > >> objects in those sections, which all have their own page. > > > > What problem was actually encountered? (i.e. why is it a problem for the > > other data to be in the page of the page-aligned data? shouldn't those > > data have their own, separate, alignment hint?) > > See: lore.kernel.org/r/87sgdmm8u4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Ah-ha: "But with explicit sections which store only page aligned objects there is an implicit guarantee that the object is alone in the page in which it is placed. That works for all objects except the last one. That's inconsistent." Understood now. The bit in this commit log for "which all have their own page" wasn't clear to me about _why_ (it was coming from .page_aligned, which means both aligned and dedicated). Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Kees Cook
