On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:28 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think we should try to get rid of the exact semantics.
Side note: I think one of the historical reasons for the exact
semantics was that we used to do things like the mount option copying
with a "copy_from_user()" iirc.
And that could take a fault at the end of the stack etc, because
"copy_mount_options()" is nasty and doesn't get a size, and just
copies "up to 4kB" of data.
It's a mistake in the interface, but it is what it is. But we've
always handled the inexact count there anyway by originally doing byte
accesses, and at some point you optimized it to just look at where
page boundaries might be..
I think that was the only truly _valid_ case of "we actually copy data
from user space, and we might need to handle a partial case", and
exactly because of that, it had already long avoided the whole "assume
copy_from_user gives us byte-accurate data before the fault".
Linus
