Sorry: Use atomic_set, not atomic read,
seams like:
+ atomic_set(&ms->mmiowb_pending, ms->nesting_count);
But you need still deal with these for atomic
struct mmiowb_state {
u16 nesting_count;
u16 mmiowb_pending;
};
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:43 PM Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Emil,
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:27 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Without this enabling CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> > results in many errors like this on the HiFive Unleashed
> > RISC-V board:
> >
> > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
> > caller is regmap_mmio_write32le+0x1c/0x46
> > CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc3-hfu+ #1
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffe000201f6e>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0x7a
> > [<ffffffe0005b290e>] dump_stack+0x6e/0x88
> > [<ffffffe00047365e>] regmap_mmio_write32le+0x18/0x46
> > [<ffffffe0005c4c26>] check_preemption_disabled+0xa4/0xaa
> > [<ffffffe00047365e>] regmap_mmio_write32le+0x18/0x46
> > [<ffffffe0004737c8>] regmap_mmio_write+0x26/0x44
> > [<ffffffe0004715c4>] regmap_write+0x28/0x48
> > [<ffffffe00043dccc>] sifive_gpio_probe+0xc0/0x1da
> > [<ffffffe00000113e>] rdinit_setup+0x22/0x26
> > [<ffffffe000469054>] platform_drv_probe+0x24/0x52
> > [<ffffffe000467e16>] really_probe+0x92/0x21a
> > [<ffffffe0004683a8>] device_driver_attach+0x42/0x4a
> > [<ffffffe0004683ac>] device_driver_attach+0x46/0x4a
> > [<ffffffe0004683f0>] __driver_attach+0x40/0xac
> > [<ffffffe0004683ac>] device_driver_attach+0x46/0x4a
> > [<ffffffe000466a3e>] bus_for_each_dev+0x3c/0x64
> > [<ffffffe000467118>] bus_add_driver+0x11e/0x184
> > [<ffffffe00046889a>] driver_register+0x32/0xc6
> > [<ffffffe00000e5ac>] gpiolib_sysfs_init+0xaa/0xae
> > [<ffffffe0000019ec>] do_one_initcall+0x50/0xfc
> > [<ffffffe00000113e>] rdinit_setup+0x22/0x26
> > [<ffffffe000001bea>] kernel_init_freeable+0x152/0x1da
> > [<ffffffe0005c4d28>] rest_init+0xde/0xe2
> > [<ffffffe0005c4d36>] kernel_init+0xa/0x11a
> > [<ffffffe0005c4d28>] rest_init+0xde/0xe2
> > [<ffffffe000200ff6>] ret_from_syscall_rejected+0x8/0xc
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This patch fixes it, but my guess is that it's not the right
> > fix. Do anyone have a better idea?
> >
> > include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h b/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
> > index 9439ff037b2d..31a21cdfbbcf 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
> > @@ -34,8 +34,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct mmiowb_state, __mmiowb_state);
> >
> > static inline void mmiowb_set_pending(void)
> > {
> > - struct mmiowb_state *ms = __mmiowb_state();
> > + struct mmiowb_state *ms;
> > +
> > + get_cpu();
> > + ms = __mmiowb_state();
> > ms->mmiowb_pending = ms->nesting_count;
> > + put_cpu();
> > }
>
> #define __mmiowb_state() this_cpu_ptr(&__mmiowb_state)
>
> The ptr is a fixed address, so don't worry about the change, and just
> use an atomic_read is enough.
> static inline void mmiowb_set_pending(void)
> {
> struct mmiowb_state *ms = __mmiowb_state();
> - ms->mmiowb_pending = ms->nesting_count;
> + ms->mmiowb_pending = atomic_read(ms->nesting_count);
> }
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guo Ren
>
> ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
