From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below.
Fix the name of litmus test.
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
index 7fe8d7a..63c4adf 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
Consider this example:
- /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */
+ /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
--
2.9.5
