Hi Arnd, On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:18:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:58:43 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:27:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > This is in preparation for removing the include of major.h where it is > > > not needed. > > > > > > These files were found using > > > > > > grep -E -L '[<"](uapi/)?linux/major\.h' $(git grep -l -w -f /tmp/xx) > > > > > > where /tmp/xx contains all the symbols defined in major.h. There were > > > a couple of files in that list that did not need the include since the > > > references are in comments. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Any reason this had an RFC, but patch 2/2 did not? > > I forgot :-) I added RFC just to hopefully get some attention as this > is just the start of a long slow use of my "spare" time. > > > They look good to me, I will be glad to take these, but do you still > > want reviews from others for this? It seems simple enough to me... > > Yeah, well, we all know the simplest patches usually cause the most pain :-) > > However, I have been fairly careful and it is an easy include file to > work with. And I have done my usual build checks, so the linux-next > maintainer won't complain about build problems :-) > > I would like to hear from Arnd, at least, as I don't want to step on > his toes (he is having a larger look at our include files). Any comment? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp4bzHYY6tWQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
