On 5/14/20 10:08 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > The kernel documentation of: > * bus_to_virt() > * memcpy_fromio() > * memcpy_toio() > refers to older parameters. > > Update it to fit the actual names. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/asm-generic/io.h | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h > index d39ac997dda8..cb617baf8d47 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h > @@ -1051,8 +1051,8 @@ static inline void *bus_to_virt(unsigned long address) > /** > * memset_io Set a range of I/O memory to a constant value > * @addr: The beginning of the I/O-memory range to set > - * @val: The value to set the memory to > - * @count: The number of bytes to set > + * @value: The value to set the memory to > + * @size: The number of bytes to set > * > * Set a range of I/O memory to a given value. > */ > @@ -1067,9 +1067,9 @@ static inline void memset_io(volatile void __iomem *addr, int value, > #define memcpy_fromio memcpy_fromio > /** > * memcpy_fromio Copy a block of data from I/O memory > - * @dst: The (RAM) destination for the copy > - * @src: The (I/O memory) source for the data > - * @count: The number of bytes to copy > + * @buffer: The (RAM) destination for the copy > + * @addr: The (I/O memory) source for the data > + * @size: The number of bytes to copy > * > * Copy a block of data from I/O memory. > */ > @@ -1085,9 +1085,9 @@ static inline void memcpy_fromio(void *buffer, > #define memcpy_toio memcpy_toio > /** > * memcpy_toio Copy a block of data into I/O memory > - * @dst: The (I/O memory) destination for the copy > - * @src: The (RAM) source for the data > - * @count: The number of bytes to copy > + * @addr: The (I/O memory) destination for the copy > + * @buffer: The (RAM) source for the data > + * @size: The number of bytes to copy > * > * Copy a block of data to I/O memory. > */ > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200424020831.30494-1-wenhu.wang@xxxxxxxx/ is a better (more complete) patch IMO. if Arnd would merge... thanks. -- ~Randy