Re: [PATCH 28/28] s390: use __vmalloc_node in stack_alloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 08.04.20 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> stack_alloc can use a slightly higher level vmalloc function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> index 36445dd40fdb..0f0b140b5558 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -305,12 +305,9 @@ void *restart_stack __section(.data);
>  unsigned long stack_alloc(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
> -	return (unsigned long)
> -		__vmalloc_node_range(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE,
> -				     VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
> -				     THREADINFO_GFP,
> -				     PAGE_KERNEL, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> -				     __builtin_return_address(0));
> +	return (unsigned long)__vmalloc_node(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE,
> +			THREADINFO_GFP, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> +			__builtin_return_address(0));

Looks sane.

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>


>  #else
>  	return __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>  #endif
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux