Le 06/03/2020 à 09:09, YunQiang Su a écrit : > From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@xxxxxxxxx> > > It can be useful to the interpreter to know which flags are in use. > > For instance, knowing if the preserve-argv[0] is in use would > allow to skip the pathname argument. > > This patch uses an unused auxiliary vector, AT_FLAGS, to add a > flag to inform interpreter if the preserve-argv[0] is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: YunQiang Su <syq@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Any advice to have this merged? Do I really need to use another AT_ entry? Thanks, Laurent
