On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Boqun Feng wrote:
>
> > Currently the litmus test "atomic-set" in atomic_t.txt has a few things
> > to be improved:
> >
> > 1) The CPU/Processor numbers "P1,P2" are not only inconsistent with
> > the rest of the document, which uses "CPU0" and "CPU1", but also
> > unacceptable by the herd tool, which requires processors start
> > at "P0".
> >
> > 2) The initialization block uses a "atomic_set()", which is OK, but
> > it's better to use ATOMIC_INIT() to make clear this is an
> > initialization.
> >
> > 3) The return value of atomic_add_unless() is discarded
> > inexplicitly, which is OK for C language, but it will be helpful
> > to the herd tool if we use a void cast to make the discard
> > explicit.
> >
> > Therefore fix these and this is the preparation for adding the litmus
> > test into memory-model litmus-tests directory so that people can
> > understand better about our requirements of atomic APIs and klitmus tool
> > can be used to generate tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Patch 5/5 in this series does basically the same thing for
> Atomic-RMW+mb__after_atomic-is-stronger-than-acquire. How come you
> used one patch for that, but this is split into two patches (2/5 and
> 4/5)?
>
When I was working one the first version, I wasn't so sure that we would
reach the agreement of where to put the litmus tests, and the litmus
test in the atomic_t.txt obviously needs a fix, so I separated the fix
and the adding of a litmus test to make my rebase easier ;-). But you're
right, the separation is not needed now.
I will merge those two patches into one in the next version, also with
the name adjustment you and Andrea have pointed out. Thanks!
Regards,
Boqun
> Alan
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> > index 0ab747e0d5ac..ceb85ada378e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> > @@ -91,15 +91,15 @@ ops. That is:
> > C atomic-set
> >
> > {
> > - atomic_set(v, 1);
> > + atomic_t v = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
> > }
> >
> > - P1(atomic_t *v)
> > + P0(atomic_t *v)
> > {
> > - atomic_add_unless(v, 1, 0);
> > + (void)atomic_add_unless(v, 1, 0);
> > }
> >
> > - P2(atomic_t *v)
> > + P1(atomic_t *v)
> > {
> > atomic_set(v, 0);
> > }
> >
>
>
