On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:34:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The functions do in fact use local_irq_{save,restore}() and can
> therefore be used when IRQs are in fact disabled. Worse, they are
> already used in places where IRQs are disabled, leading to great
> confusion when reading the code.
>
> Rename them to fix this confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
FWIW I'd have called that _irqsafe() as irqsave() suggests some return
value to later restore.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
