Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] perf,tracing: Allow function tracing when !RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (20/02/14 11:28), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/02/12 22:01), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Since perf is now able to deal with !rcu_is_watching() contexts,
> > remove the restraint.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int perf_ftrace_function_register
> >  {
> >  	struct ftrace_ops *ops = &event->ftrace_ops;
> >  
> > -	ops->flags   = FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU;
> > +	ops->flags   = 0;
> 
> FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED?

No, never mind.

	-ss



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux