On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:14:15AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > My initial patch has __preempt_count_add/sub() in, but then I figured > > someone would go complain the tracepoint would go missing. > > Fine, but what bug are you trying to fix? I haven't seen one mentioned > yet. Function tracing has recursion protection, and tracing > preempt_count in nmi_enter() causes no problems. What's the problem you > are trying to solve? The same one as yesterday; if we hit a tracer in NMI context, when !rcu_is_watching() and in_nmi() is still 0, we're fucked.
