On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/30/20 5:08 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on > > late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized > > execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests > > when loaded. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/kunit/test.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +- > > lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c > > > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > > index 2dfb550c6723a..8a02f93a6b505 100644 > > --- a/include/kunit/test.h > > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > > The following fragment does not match the test.h in Linux 5.5 or 5.4-rc1 (as one > possible earlier version). And we are not to Linux 5.5-rc1 yet. (Simple way > to check for the mis-match - 5.5 has kunit_test_suite() instead of > kunit_test_suites().) > > I know that there is an alternate tree where some of the development occurs. > Can you please add a link in MAINTAINERS? And please note (at least in > patch 0) what tree the series is developed against? Yep, I was planning on sending an update to the MAINTAINERS with that and some other updates soon. In future revisions, I will put a link to the tree I developed against. In the meantime, we send pull-requests from here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/log/?h=kunit And that is what I used as my development base for this series.
