On 17.12.19 15:06, Greg KH wrote: > That's not needed, and you are going to break the implicit ordering we > already have with link order. Ups, 10 points for you - I didn't consider that. > You are going to have to figure out what > bus type the driver is, to determine what segment it was in, to figure > out what was loaded before what. hmm, if it's just the ordering by bus type (but not within one bus type), then it shouldn't be the big deal to fix, as I'll need one table and register-loop per bus-type anyways. By the way: how is there init order ensured with dynamically loaded modules ? (for cases where there aren't explicit symbol dependencies) --mtx --- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287
