On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:24:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> > PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> > trapped instruction.
> >
> > Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> > non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > index d69c1ef..33957a12 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> > {
> > if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> > kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> > - else
> > + else {
> > *vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> > + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> > + }
>
> Style nit: both sides of an if-else should match brace-wise. i.e. please
> add braces to the other side.
Will fix. Strange, checkpatch didn't catch that, maybe because only one
arm of the if was patched.
> As with the prior patch, the u64 cast can also go.
>
> Otherwise, this looks right to me.
For some reason I thought there was a different prevailing style in the
KVM code, but now I see no evidence of that.
Will fix.
Thanks for the review.
Cheers
---Dave
