Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduces new count-based method for monitoring lockless pagetable walks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:46 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> I am not sure if it would be ok to use irq_{save,restore} in real mode,
> I will do some more reading of the docs before addressing this. 

It looks like it's unsafe to merge irq_{save,restore} in
{start,end}_lockless_pgtbl_walk(), due to a possible access of code
that is not accessible in real mode.

I am sending a v4 for the changes so far.
I will look forward for your feedback.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux