Le 24/08/2019 à 21:08, Kees Cook a écrit :
Euh ... only received this mail yesterday. Same for the other answer.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:26:59PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 23/08/2019 à 00:56, Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:47:55 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reply-To: 20190819234111.9019-8-keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Really?
That seems correct, that's the "[PATCH 7/7] bug: Move WARN_ON() "cut here"
into exception handler" from the series at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/19/1155
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] bug: Move WARN_ON() "cut here" into exception handler
It's strange to receive a standalone [7/7] patch.
Iaw the Reply_To, I understand it as an update of the 7th patch of the
series.
Was trying to avoid the churn of resending the identical 1-6 patches
(which are all just refactoring to make 7/7 not a mess).
Yes but Reply-To: means the address we have to use to answer to this email.
I think you wanted to use In-reply-to:
I can resend the whole series, if that's preferred.
I guess not.
Reported-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
Fixes: Fixes: 6b15f678fb7d ("include/asm-generic/bug.h: fix "cut here" for WARN_ON for __WARN_TAINT architectures")
I'm seeing double.
Tracking down all these combinations has been tricky, which is why I did
the patch 1-6 refactoring: it makes the call hierarchy much easier to
examine (IMO).
But still, Andrew is seing double ... And me as well :)
Fixes: Fixes:
Christophe
-Kees
