On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:28:51 +0100 Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:43:59PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > There isn't a good reason to differentiate between the user address > > space layout modification syscalls and the other memory > > permission/attributes ones (e.g. mprotect, madvise) w.r.t. the tagged > > address ABI. Untag the user addresses on entry to these functions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/mmap.c | 5 +++++ > > mm/mremap.c | 6 +----- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Andrew -- please can you pick this patch up? I'll take the rest of the > series via arm64 once we've finished discussing the wording details. > Sure, I grabbed the patch from the v9 series. But please feel free to include this in the arm64 tree - I'll autodrop my copy if this turns up in linux-next.