Re: [PATCH] ARC: ARCv2: jump label: implement jump label patching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/17/19 8:09 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>>> +/* Halt system on fatal error to make debug easier */
>>> +#define arc_jl_fatal(format...)						\
>>> +({									\
>>> +	pr_err(JUMPLABEL_ERR format);					\
>>> +	BUG();								\
>> Does it make sense to bring down the whole system vs. failing and returning.
>> I see there is no error propagation to core code, but still.
> I totally agree with Peter, and I prefer to stop the system on this errors. Here is few arguments:
> All this checks can't be toggle in system operating normally and only may be caused by bad code generation (or some code/data corruption):
> 1) We got our instruction to patch unaligned by 4 bytes (despite the fact that we used '.balign 4' to align it)
> 2) We got branch offset unaligned (which means that we calculate it wrong at build time or corrupt it in run time)
> 3) We got branch offset which not fits into s25. As this is offset inside one function (inside one 'if' statement actually) we newer get such huge
> offset in real life if code generation is ok.

I understand that. But AFAIKR in implementation arc_jl_fatal() gets called before
we have done the actual code patching and/or flushing the caches to that effect.
So harm has been done just yet. We just need to make sure that any book-keeping of
true/false is not yet done or unrolled.

> If we only warn to log and return we will face with compromised kernel flow later.
> I.E. it could be 'if' statement in kernel text which is switched to wrong state: the condition is true but we take the false branch.
> And It will be the issue which is much more difficult to debug.
>
> Does it sound reasonably?

I'm still not convinced that by hitting the _fatal() we are in some inconsistent
state already. But if u feel strongly lets keep it.

>
> If you really don't want to have BUG here, I can make it conditionally enabled

Not a good idea. It is unconditionally present or not. Not something in between.

> in depend on CONFIG_ARC_STATIC_KEYS_DEBUG as I want to have it enabled at least on ARC development platforms.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux