> On Jul 16, 2019, at 7:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote: >> +/** >> + * find_successor - Scan the main waiting queue looking for the first >> + * thread running on the same node as the lock holder. If found (call it >> + * thread T), move all threads in the main queue between the lock holder >> + * and T to the end of the secondary queue and return T; otherwise, return NULL. >> + */ >> +static struct cna_node *find_successor(struct mcs_spinlock *me) > > Either don't use a kernel doc comment, but if you must, you have to > stick to their format, otherwise we'll get endless stupid patches fixing > up the stupid comment. Will fix that. Thanks, — Alex
