On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:25:32PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c > index e14b32c69639..961781624638 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c > @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > if (!next) > next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL)); > > - arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked); > + arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked, 1); > pv_kick_node(lock, next); My problem with this patch is that the above reads really daft. Should we rename the whole function? arch_mcs_pass_lock() perhaps?
