RE: [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: David Laight
> Sent: 11 June 2019 10:52
...
> FWIW is ERESTARTNOHAND actually sane here?
> If I've used setitimer() to get SIGALARM generated every second I'd
> expect select() to return EINTR every second even if I don't
> have a SIGALARM handler?

Actually no - after sigset(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN) I'd expect absolutely
nothing to happen when kill(pid, SIGALRM) is called.

However if I run:

	struct itimerval itimerval = {{1, 0}, {1, 0}};
	setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &itimerval, NULL);
	sigset(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);

	poll(0, 0, big_timeout);

I see (with strace) poll() repeatedly returning ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK
and being restarted.
Replacing poll() with pselect() returns ERESTARTNOHAND.
(In both cases the timeout must be updated since the application
does see the timeout.)

I'm sure other unix kernels completely ignore signals set to SIG_IGN.
So this restart dance just isn't needed.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux