Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Maciej Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 08:41:31 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "arnd@xxxxxxxx" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1905300243200.18422@tpp.hgst.com>
References: <20190412143538.11780-1-hch@lst.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1905300243200.18422@tpp.hgst.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:46:18AM +0000, Maciej Rozycki wrote:
> > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ != __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> > +#error "Unsupported endianess, check your toolchain"
> 
>  Typo here: s/endianess/endianness/.

The original patch has already been merged, please send a fixup.

References:
- [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess
  - From: Maciej Rozycki

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] elf: align AT_RANDOM bytes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel endianess
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/5] cpu/speculation: Add 'mitigations=' cmdline option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]