Re: [LTP] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > > There is a problem with the stack size accounting during execve when
> > > there is no stack limit:
> > >
> > > $ ulimit -s
> > > 8192
> > > $ ./hello.ilp32 
> > > Hello World!
> > > $ ulimit -s unlimited
> > > $ ./hello.ilp32 
> > > Segmentation fault
> > > $ strace ./hello.ilp32 
> > > execve("./hello.ilp32", ["./hello.ilp32"], 0xfffff10548f0 /* 77 vars */) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
> > > +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > >
> > > Andreas.
> > 
> > Thanks Andreas, I will take a look. Do we have such test in LTP?
> 
> We do have a test that we can run a binary with very small stack size
> i.e. 512kB but there does not seem to be anything that would catch this
> specific problem.
> 
> Can you please open an issue and describe how to reproduce the problem
> at our github tracker:
> 
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues
> 
> Then we can create testcase based on that reproducer later on.

This is it:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/530

Yury



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux