On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:46:40PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Peter Zijlstra's on April 25, 2019 10:04 pm: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:34:43PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > >> Since last time, I added a compile time option to opt-out of this > >> if the platform does not support suspend on non-zero, and tried to > >> improve legibility of changelogs and explain the justification > >> better. > >> > >> I have been testing this on powerpc/pseries and it seems to work > >> fine (the firmware call to suspend can be called on any CPU and > >> resumes where it left off), but not included here because the > >> code has some bitrot unrelated to this series which I hacked to > >> fix. I will discuss it and either send an acked patch to go with > >> this series if it is small, or fix it in powerpc tree. > >> > > > > Rafael, Frederic, any comments? > > > > Sorry to ping again, I guess people are probably busy after vacation. > Any chance we could get this in next merge window? Peter are you okay > with the config option as it is, then we can look at adapting it to > what x86 needs as a follow up (e.g., allow nohz CPU0 for > cpu0_hotpluggable case)? Yeah, let me just queue these here patches. Not sure they'll still make the upcoming merge window, but we can try.
