Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:38:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Shall each architcture maintainer take care of this hxxself, or will
> > > this be done in
> > > a coordinated way?
> >
> > I was planning to send a patch for all architectures this time
> > (after all three sets are merged, which is now), and ask future
>
> Just to clarify, are you referring to your sets? I think Linus hasn't
> gotten around to reviewing the PR for pidfd_send_signal() yet. :)

Ah, I thought he had already merged both, the confusion was on
my end.

      Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux