Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will
> > just create conflicts with my series..
> 
> I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both
> series as a single set.
> Preferences? 

So far there wasn't really much a reason to rebase my series, hope
this gets picked up either by Andrew or Al (not sure what the right
place is).  I think for now just rebase your series on top, we can
then figure out how to proceed.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux