Ok, those test robot reports are hard to read, but trying to distill it down:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:19 AM Chen Rong <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \
> 196250 ± 8% -64.1% 70494 will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
That's the original 64% regression..
And then with the patch set:
> %stddev change %stddev
> \ | \
> 71190 180% 199232 ± 4% will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
looks like it's back up where it used to be.
So I guess we have numbers for the regression now. Thanks.
And that closes my biggest question for the new model, and with the
new organization that gets ird of the arch-specific asm separately
first and makes it a bit more legible that way, I guess I'll just Ack
the whole series.
Linus
