On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:07:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:19:17 +0900 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's a shame that it doesn't actually dercease the kernel line count, > but there are other benefits. > > The patches are missing the hoped-for acks, but I think you maintain > most/all of those drivers. I'm okay with the code as well, so, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Do we have any expectation that these facilities will be used by > anything other than GPIO? If not then perhaps they should be sited > within drivers/gpio (presumably as a standalone module) until such a > need is found? I think I have an example out of GPIO realm. But I need time to prove that. In any case I tend to bend to the generic exposure than to local one. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
