Re: [PATCH 05/15] Add io_uring IO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/11/19 11:19 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jens,
> 
>> +struct io_uring_sqe {
>> +	__u8	opcode;
>> +	__u8	flags;
>> +	__u16	ioprio;
>> +	__s32	fd;
>> +	__u64	off;
>> +	union {
>> +		void	*addr;
>> +		__u64	__pad;
>> +	};
>> +	__u32	len;
>> +	union {
>> +		__kernel_rwf_t	rw_flags;
>> +		__u32		__resv;
>> +	};
>> +};
> 
> A bit tongue in cheek and yet somewhat serious: While I'm super excited
> about the 4 x 64 bitness of the sqe, where does the integrity buffer go?
> Or the 128-bit KV store key. How do we extend this interface beyond the
> flags?

For integrity buffers, how about we stash them on the side? The newer
series has an extra system call, io_uring_register(), which is currently
used for registering files and buffers for IO on the side. You could
trivially tie an integrity buffer to an sqe through that.

For KV, I thint that's an actually interesting use case (sorry,
integrity), and we might just want to bite the bullet and extend the sqe
to full 64 bytes.  We're currently at 48 bytes, which leaves us with 16
bytes of space for KV, and other use cases.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux