On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:18:53AM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:07:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello! > > > > This series contains updates for the Linux-kernel memory model: > > > > 1-3. Add SRCU support, courtesy of Alan Stern. > > > > 4. Update README for adding of SRCU support. > > > > 5. Update memory-barriers.txt on enforcing heavy ordering for > > port-I/O accesses, courtesy of Will Deacon. This one needs > > an ack, preferably by someone from Intel. Matthew Wilcox > > posted some feedback from an Intel manual here, which might > > be considered to be a close substitute, but... ;-) > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127192234.GF10377@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > 6. Update Documentation/explanation.txt to include SRCU support, > > courtesy of Alan Stern. > > > > 7. Dynamically check SRCU lock-to-unlock matching, courtesy of > > Luc Maranget. This needs an ack. > > It seems that > > 1b52d0186177 ("tools/memory-model: Model smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()") > > from linux-rcu/dev got lost; this also needs an ack (probably yours! ;D, > considered that, IIRC, you introduced the primitive and RCU is currently > its only user.) That commit is in -tip: 4607abbcf464 ("tools/memory-model: Model smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()") So it has already left my -rcu tree. ;-) Thanx, Paul
