Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:09:35 +0000
James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
> 

> I gave this branch a spin, but I hit the WARN_ON() fairly easily:

Thanks for testing!

Can you see if this patch fixes it for you?

-- Steve

diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index d4f04f0ca646..8dfd5021b933 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ unsigned long ftrace_return_to_handler(unsigned long frame_pointer)
 struct ftrace_ret_stack *
 ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(struct task_struct *task, int idx)
 {
-	idx = current->curr_ret_stack - idx;
+	idx = task->curr_ret_stack - idx;
 
 	if (idx >= 0 && idx <= task->curr_ret_stack)
-		return &current->ret_stack[idx];
+		return &task->ret_stack[idx];
 
 	return NULL;
 }




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux