Re: [PATCH 19/34] cxl: drop the dma_set_mask callback from vphb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ping?

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:22:59AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The CXL code never even looks at the dma mask, so there is no good
> reason for this sanity check.  Remove it because it gets in the way
> of the dma ops refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c | 12 ------------
>  1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> index 7908633d9204..49da2f744bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> @@ -11,17 +11,6 @@
>  #include <misc/cxl.h>
>  #include "cxl.h"
>  
> -static int cxl_dma_set_mask(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 dma_mask)
> -{
> -	if (dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) {
> -		pr_info("%s only 64bit DMA supported on CXL", __func__);
> -		return -EIO;
> -	}
> -
> -	*(pdev->dev.dma_mask) = dma_mask;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int cxl_pci_probe_mode(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>  	return PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
> @@ -220,7 +209,6 @@ static struct pci_controller_ops cxl_pci_controller_ops =
>  	.reset_secondary_bus = cxl_pci_reset_secondary_bus,
>  	.setup_msi_irqs = cxl_setup_msi_irqs,
>  	.teardown_msi_irqs = cxl_teardown_msi_irqs,
> -	.dma_set_mask = cxl_dma_set_mask,
>  };
>  
>  int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux