Re: [PATCH 2/8] sockopt: Rename SO_TIMESTAMP* to SO_TIMESTAMP*_OLD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 7:59 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:58 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > SO_TIMESTAMP, SO_TIMESTAMPNS and SO_TIMESTAMPING options, the
> > way they are currently defined, are not y2038 safe.
> > Subsequent patches in the series add new y2038 safe versions
> > of these options which provide 64 bit timestamps on all
> > architectures uniformly.
> > Hence, rename existing options with OLD tag suffixes.
>
> Why do the existing interfaces have to be renamed when new interfaces are added?

Existing options need to be renamed because of the macro below:

#define SO_TIMESTAMP (sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(__kernel_long_t) ? \
            SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD : SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)

SO_TIMESTAMP is now dependent on size of time_t because of the libc flag.

-Deepa



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux