On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The system call tables are in different format in all
> architecture and it will be difficult to manually add,
> modify or delete the syscall table entries in the res-
> pective files. To make it easy by keeping a script and
> which will generate the uapi header and syscall table
> file. This change will also help to unify the implemen-
> tation across all architectures.
>
> The system call table generation script is added in
> kernel/syscalls directory which contain the scripts to
> generate both uapi header file and system call table
> files. The syscall.tbl will be input for the scripts.
>
> syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls
> along with system call number and corresponding entry
> point. Add a new system call in this architecture will
> be possible by adding new entry in the syscall.tbl file.
>
> Adding a new table entry consisting of:
> - System call number.
> - ABI.
> - System call name.
> - Entry point name.
> - Compat entry name, if required.
>
> syscallhdr.sh and syscalltbl.sh will generate uapi
> header unistd_64/n32/o32.h and syscall_table_32_o32/-
> 64_64/64-n32/64-o32.h files respectively. Both .sh files
> will parse the content syscall.tbl to generate the header
> and table files. unistd_64/n32/o32.h will be included by
> uapi/asm/unistd.h and syscall_table_32_o32/64_64/64-n32-
> /64-o32.h is included by kernel/syscall_table32_o32/64-
> _64/64-n32/64-o32.S - the real system call table.
>
> ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does have similar support.
> I leverage their implementation to come up with a generic
> solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ah, I see you added the syscallnr.sh script from ARM. I guess
that is one way to handle it, and the implementation seems
fine. It would be good to mention it in the changelog text above
though.
Arnd
