From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:09:57 +0530 > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 02:03, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> If sys_nis_syscall for the compat syscall shows up in a situation where the >> native 32-bit syscall does have an entry, that's a BUG and the script should >> point this out so that the bug can be fixed. > > syscall.tbl is the input to the script, so the developers has the > responsibility to fill the table > properly. I don't know, we have to write a script which has to be > smart enough to catch the > wrong syscall entries. It does not need anything "smart", it just needs to see that sys_nis_syscall in the "compat" column just as my eyes noticed them in your patch. It can be completely automated.
