On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:32 PM Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure, however, whether such a change that provides no ability > > to configure or affect it will go well with all the supported > > architectures. > > Is there a concrete reason why you think an architecture might not > like this? As far as I can tell, the virtual address space overhead > should be insignificant even for 32-bit systems. Not really, and not architectures per se, but judging by some past experiences with enabling ASLR, I would expect that all kinds of weird applications may start to behave in all kinds of strange ways. Not that I have anything more than this doubt, however; but this sort of change without any ability to tune or revert it still looks unusual to me.